Sample report, no signup needed

This is what Pronto actually tells you

A real report from our scoring engine. The candidate is made up, the job posting is a composite, and every score and finding below is genuine engine output. We did not write these numbers by hand.

Resume
Paul Parker
Freelance photographer, 3 years experience
Applying for
Staff Photographer
B2B SaaS, mid-level
60
ATS match score

A 52 means this application very likely gets filtered before a human reads it. The resume itself is well formatted, which is why most people never suspect a problem. The gap is what the content says relative to what the role asks for.

Where the score comes from

Five categories, weighted. Relevance counts for the most because it is the hardest thing to fake.

Keyword match20% of total
59/100

How much of the job description vocabulary actually appears in the resume

Formatting20% of total
100/100

Whether an ATS can parse the structure cleanly

Action verbs15% of total
62/100

Strength of the verbs opening each bullet

Quantification15% of total
50/100

Share of bullets carrying a concrete number or outcome

Relevance30% of total
62/100

How closely the actual experience maps to what the role requires

What it found

Specific and occasionally blunt. A tool that tells everyone they look great is not worth running.

Critical

The experience is there; the posting cannot see it

Three years of freelance news photography, filed to deadline for local papers, is most of what this job asks for. What the resume never says is which cameras, how fast, or that any of it was breaking news. The posting names DSLR and mirrorless systems, photo transmission, and enterprise story ideas. None of those words appear, so the relevant experience scores as a gap rather than a match.

Needs work

Weak verbs are giving away work that was done

"Assisted senior photographers", "helped maintain", "learned photo editing". Each one hands credit to somebody else, and this candidate was in a newsroom working to a photo desk. "Covered", "produced", "edited" and "filed" describe exactly the same work and are the distinction an editor is scanning for.

Needs work

The numbers are already there, unused

One bullet says 500 photographs, which is a real figure. What it does not say is the deadline they were shot to, and this is a job about deadlines. "Shot and transmitted 500+ published photographs, filing breaking news on deadlines as tight as 15 minutes" uses the same fact to answer the question the posting is actually asking.

Already in the resume

7 terms matched

breaking news photographynews judgmentadobe photoshopadobe lightroomphoto editingdigital asset managementdeadline management

Missing, and the job asks for them

9 terms absent

dslr camera systemsmirrorless camerasphoto transmissionenterprise story ideasphoto essaysvideo journalismsocial media photographymobile journalismnew york city knowledge

Run this on your own resume

Same engine, your resume, the job you are actually applying to. Pronto then rewrites it to close the gaps and drafts a matching cover letter in your voice.

Free account. No card required.

Scores produced by the same engine that runs on live accounts. The candidate and employer names are fictional. Results vary with your resume and the specific job description.